Friday, September 16, 2005

Jews and Freemasons?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/09/12/nthom12.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/09/12/ixportal.html

'Jews and Freemasons controlled war on Iraq.'

Toby Helm, in the UK Telegraph, 12/09/2005, relates the views of British barrister Martin Thomson:

'Tony Blair decided to wage war on Iraq after coming under the influence of a "sinister" group of Jews and Freemasons....'

Mr Thomson wrote a book in 1994 in which he said Freemasons and Jews controlled the governments of Europe and America.

Thomson also writes that the Jews have no right to live in "the Holy Land" because they are not a pure race and therefore not the true biblical Israelites and that Saddam was used as an excuse for US troops - "including thousands of Jews" - to occupy Saudi Arabia.

~~~

http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:tt8ZfhAIteMJ:irish-nationalism.com/forum/showthread.php%3Fgoto%3Dlastpost%26t%3D160+the+next-world-order+thomson&hl=en

Excerpted from The Next World Order by Ahmad Thomson, Copyright © 1994.

'During the first half of the present century, Communism (formulated by Karl Marx, an Ashkenazi Jew) dominated Russian politics, and Zionism (championed by Chaim Weizmann, an Ashkenazi Jew) dominated American politics. In the words of Douglas Reed, "Communism was designed to subvert the masses" while "Zionism set out to subvert rulers at the top" - and events throughout the twentieth century clearly indicate that these twin aims have been largely achieved'

~~

http://www.rense.com/general49/whoxo.htm

THE TWO-HEADED CONSPIRACY IN RUSSIA, 1917

Excerpted from The Next World Order by Ahmad (Martin) Thomson

Douglas Reed in The Controversy of Zion concludes:


... this only became clear when the [Russian/Bolshevik] revolution of 1917 produced an almost all-Jewish government in Russia; and by that time power [of Ashkenazim] over governments in the West was so great that the nature of this new regime was little discussed, a virtual law of heresy having come into force there.

... This was Mr. Robert Wilton, correspondent of the London Times, who experienced the Bolshevik revolution. The French edition of his book included the official Bolshevik lists of the membership of the ruling revolutionary bodies (they were omitted from the English edition).

These records show that the Central Committee of the Bolshevik party, which wielded the supreme power, contained 3 Russians (including Lenin) and 9 Jews. The next body in importance, the Central Committee of the Executive Commission (or secret police) comprised 42 Jews and 19 Russians, Letts, Georgians and others. The Council of People's Commissars consisted of 17 Jews and five others.

The Moscow Che-ka (secret police) was formed of 23 Jews and 13 others. Among the names of 556 high officials of the Bolshevik state officially published in 1918 - 1919 were 458 Jews and 108 others. Among the central committees of small, supposedly "Socialist" or other non-Communist parties (during that early period the semblance of "opposition" was permitted, to beguile the masses, accustomed under the Czar to opposition parties) were 55 Jews and 6 others. All the names are given in the original documents reproduced by Mr. Wilton.


It is also clear that this majority continued to be sustained long after the 'Jewish' revolution had toppled Russia's former 'Christian' rulers:


In 1933 the American Jewish journal 'Opinion' stated that Jews occupied almost all important ambassadorial posts and that in White Russia 61 percent of all officials were Jews; it also stated that the Jewish percentage of the population (then given as 158,400,000) was "less than 2 percent". If this was true it meant that Russia at that time contained less than 3,000,000 Jews. In 1933 the 'Jewish Chronicle' stated that one-third of the Jews in Russia had become officials. If this was the case, they plainly formed the new governing class.

Mr. Wilton indicated: "Taken according to numbers of population, the Jews represented one in ten; among the commissars that rule Bolshevist Russia they are nine in ten; if anything the proportion of Jews is still greater." This was plain reporting, and if the report had related to "Ukranians", for instance, instead of "Jews", none would have objected; the mere act of reporting a fact became the ground for secret denunciation because the fact related to Jews.





~~

No comments: